Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is a noticeboard for things particularly relevant to Wikipedians working on articles on India.
Article alerts for WikiProject India

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(71 more...)

Proposed deletions

(17 more...)

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Files for discussion

Featured article candidates

Featured list candidates

Good article nominees

(9 more...)

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

(13 more...)

Articles to be merged

(41 more...)

Articles to be split

(15 more...)

Articles for creation

(31 more...)

This table is updated daily by a bot

Wikipedia Meetups edit
Upcoming
none
Recent
Outside India
Past meetups

Lakh and crore RFC

[edit]

There is a RFC discussion on the use of lakh and crore at Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#RfC Indian numbering conventions. Please make comments there, not here. Thank you.  Stepho  talk  23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article but it’s been unsourced and unimproved almost 15 years. Please find and add references. Bearian (talk) 03:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tihawali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small village. Not enough information to merge. Can redirect if necessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments/help at WikiProj:Archaeology

[edit]

Just asking for people interested in India-related topics for help or input at my discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Archaeology. Thanks. Tolozen (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dal Lake

[edit]

Dal Lake has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Khandoba

[edit]

Khandoba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces

[edit]

There is an active proposal to merge Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces into The Establishment (Pakistan). Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks. 109.204.231.244 (talk) 11:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Indian Institute of Management Rohtak

[edit]

Indian Institute of Management Rohtak has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Ujjal Dosanjh

[edit]

Ujjal Dosanjh has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all! I'm in the process of making some pretty extensive edits to this article (mostly removing portfolio-esque content copied from LinkedIn), but need some additional sources for verification. My searches in English are turning up very few results. Any help getting this off the ground would be appreciated - thanks! jellyfish  23:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]